» Plaine Commune » Traffic » Express decision (demo only) #3

i5: Paint the Town Hall
Draft revision 8

Paint the town hall in red

Reason

It's time!

About Suggestions

Specify color: good idea. done. -adopted-
Blue: Thank you but I don't think this is a good idea. - not adopted-

Source

Express decision (demo only) #3

1. Admission (reached 1)

2. Discussion (finished)

3. Verification (reached 10.0% / 1)

4. Voting (finished)

Finished with winner

Competing initiatives

Competing initiatives in pairwise comparison to winner:
i6: Let's paint our town hall in blue
by Andreas Nitsche
i7: Paint the town hall with white color
by Björn Swierczek
i8: i8: Leave Town Hall at it is
by Alejandro Blanco-M

TRACE

System trace (for computer programmers purposes)

this: u=1.7, d=0.0, t=1.7 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=1.7, d=0.0, t=1.7 ms
Configuration "devel"
REQUESTED VIEW: draft/show
this: u=3.8, d=5.5, t=9.0 | children: u=20.3, d=19.7, t=36.8 | total: u=24.1, d=25.1, t=45.8 ms
/main/_filter/20_session.lua
- INSERT INTO "session" ("additional_secret", "ident") VALUES ('fUMOfsIzOhERGkNZQ6xWvjRh6DoG7EK25a2ul4qXO77ynfA0', 'g0H5EFNXRtXYe2CogoJBDfS2') RETURNING "ident"; 5.5 ms
- this: u=0.5, d=0.0, t=0.5 | children: u=19.9, d=19.7, t=36.3 | total: u=20.3, d=19.7, t=36.8 ms
  /main/_filter/21_auth.lua
  - No authentication needed.
  - this: u=0.8, d=0.0, t=0.8 | children: u=19.1, d=19.7, t=35.5 | total: u=19.9, d=19.7, t=36.3 ms
    /main/_filter_view/30_navigation.lua
    - this: u=0.1, d=0.0, t=0.1 | children: u=19.0, d=19.7, t=35.4 | total: u=19.1, d=19.7, t=35.5 ms
      /main/_filter_view/34_stylesheet.lua
      - this: u=0.2, d=0.0, t=0.2 | children: u=18.8, d=19.7, t=35.2 | total: u=19.0, d=19.7, t=35.4 ms
        /main/_filter_view/36_html_title.lua
        this: u=4.6, d=5.3, t=9.3 | children: u=14.2, d=14.4, t=25.9 | total: u=18.8, d=19.7, t=35.2 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: draft/show
        SELECT "draft".* FROM "draft" WHERE (id = 8) LIMIT 1; 1.9 ms
        SELECT "initiative".* FROM "initiative" WHERE ("initiative"."id" IN (5)); 1.9 ms
        SELECT "issue".*, justify_interval(min_admission_time)::text AS "min_admission_time_text", justify_interval(max_admission_time)::text AS "max_admission_time_text", justify_interval(discussion_time)::text AS "discussion_time_text", justify_interval(verification_time)::text AS "verification_time_text", justify_interval(voting_time)::text AS "voting_time_text", justify_interval(coalesce(issue.fully_frozen + issue.voting_time, issue.half_frozen + issue.verification_time, issue.accepted + issue.discussion_time, issue.created + issue.max_admission_time) - now()) AS "state_time_left", justify_interval(now() - issue.closed) AS "closed_ago" FROM "issue" WHERE ("issue"."id" IN (3)); 1.6 ms
        this: u=4.9, d=2.8, t=7.3 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=4.9, d=2.8, t=7.3 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: issue/_head
        SELECT "policy".*, justify_interval(min_admission_time)::text AS "min_admission_time_text", justify_interval(max_admission_time)::text AS "max_admission_time_text", justify_interval(discussion_time)::text AS "discussion_time_text", justify_interval(verification_time)::text AS "verification_time_text", justify_interval(voting_time)::text AS "voting_time_text" FROM "policy" WHERE ("policy"."id" IN (2)); 1.0 ms
        SELECT "area".* FROM "area" WHERE ("area"."id" IN (1)); 0.8 ms
        SELECT "unit".* FROM "unit" WHERE ("unit"."id" IN (1)); 0.9 ms
        this: u=0.1, d=0.0, t=0.1 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=0.1, d=0.0, t=0.1 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: draft/_show
        this: u=0.5, d=0.0, t=0.5 | children: u=8.7, d=11.6, t=18.1 | total: u=9.2, d=11.6, t=18.5 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: issue/_sidebar
        this: u=0.7, d=0.0, t=0.7 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=0.7, d=0.0, t=0.7 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: issue/_sidebar_state
        this: u=1.0, d=3.1, t=3.8 | children: u=7.0, d=8.5, t=13.6 | total: u=8.0, d=11.6, t=17.3 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: issue/_sidebar_issue
        SELECT "initiative".* FROM "initiative" WHERE ("initiative"."issue_id" IN (3)) ORDER BY initiative.admitted DESC NULLS LAST, initiative.rank NULLS LAST, initiative.harmonic_weight DESC NULLS LAST, id; 3.1 ms
        this: u=0.5, d=0.0, t=0.5 | children: u=6.5, d=8.5, t=13.1 | total: u=7.0, d=8.5, t=13.6 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_list
        this: u=1.6, d=4.0, t=5.3 | children: u=1.1, d=0.7, t=1.7 | total: u=2.7, d=4.7, t=7.0 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_list_element
        SELECT "draft".* FROM "draft" WHERE ("initiative_id" = 6) ORDER BY "id" DESC LIMIT 1; 1.0 ms
        SELECT "member".*, "initiator"."initiative_id" AS "mm_ref_", initiator.accepted AS "accepted" FROM "member" INNER JOIN "initiator" ON "initiator"."member_id" = "member"."id" WHERE ("initiator"."initiative_id" IN (6)) AND (initiator.accepted) ORDER BY member.name; 3.0 ms
        this: u=1.1, d=0.7, t=1.7 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=1.1, d=0.7, t=1.7 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_bargraph
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 5) AND (losing_initiative_id = 6) LIMIT 1; 0.6 ms
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 6) AND (losing_initiative_id = 5) LIMIT 1; 0.2 ms
        this: u=1.3, d=1.4, t=2.2 | children: u=0.7, d=0.6, t=1.1 | total: u=2.1, d=2.1, t=3.3 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_list_element
        SELECT "draft".* FROM "draft" WHERE ("initiative_id" = 7) ORDER BY "id" DESC LIMIT 1; 0.3 ms
        SELECT "member".*, "initiator"."initiative_id" AS "mm_ref_", initiator.accepted AS "accepted" FROM "member" INNER JOIN "initiator" ON "initiator"."member_id" = "member"."id" WHERE ("initiator"."initiative_id" IN (7)) AND (initiator.accepted) ORDER BY member.name; 1.1 ms
        this: u=0.7, d=0.6, t=1.1 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=0.7, d=0.6, t=1.1 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_bargraph
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 5) AND (losing_initiative_id = 7) LIMIT 1; 0.4 ms
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 7) AND (losing_initiative_id = 5) LIMIT 1; 0.2 ms
        this: u=1.4, d=1.4, t=2.3 | children: u=0.3, d=0.3, t=0.5 | total: u=1.7, d=1.7, t=2.8 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_list_element
        SELECT "draft".* FROM "draft" WHERE ("initiative_id" = 8) ORDER BY "id" DESC LIMIT 1; 0.5 ms
        SELECT "member".*, "initiator"."initiative_id" AS "mm_ref_", initiator.accepted AS "accepted" FROM "member" INNER JOIN "initiator" ON "initiator"."member_id" = "member"."id" WHERE ("initiator"."initiative_id" IN (8)) AND (initiator.accepted) ORDER BY member.name; 0.9 ms
        this: u=0.3, d=0.3, t=0.5 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=0.3, d=0.3, t=0.5 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_bargraph
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 5) AND (losing_initiative_id = 8) LIMIT 1; 0.2 ms
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 8) AND (losing_initiative_id = 5) LIMIT 1; 0.1 ms
  - End of authentication filter.

i5: Paint the Town HallDraft revision 8

Reason

About Suggestions

Express decision (demo only) #3

Competing initiatives

System trace (for computer programmers purposes)

i5: Paint the Town Hall
Draft revision 8